To Blackpool Council,
Re: Planning Application 26/0242
I am writing to object to the planning application for the proposed “parrot experience” attraction in Blackpool.
I urge the council to refuse this application for the following reasons:
• Noise and disturbance: The application suggests that “lesser vocal” birds, such as macaws, would be used to limit noise. However, parrots – including macaws – are naturally loud animals whose calls are an essential part of their communication behaviour. Their vocalisations can be frequent and high volume, which may lead to persistent noise that would impact the wider community. While the application states that soundproofing will be carried out, sound is unlikely to be eliminated. This means there is still a chance that the noise could affect residents in flats above the establishment and surrounding.
• Suitability of the environment: Parrots are highly intelligent, active, and social wild animals who require a lot of space to fly, opportunities to perform complex behaviours, and appropriate social groupings. An indoor, artificial setting designed for public interaction cannot meet their needs.
• Animal welfare concerns: Research has identified serious welfare issues for parrots in captivity, including social isolation, restricted environments, and an inability to express natural behaviours. These conditions can lead to stress, frustration, aggression and abnormal behaviours like feather-plucking, pacing and bar biting. Parrots kept in captivity retain the same needs and instincts as their wild counterparts.
• Ethical and planning considerations: Attractions that rely on close interaction with captive wild animals raise broader ethical concerns and contribute to the commercial exploitation of wildlife for entertainment, as ‘pets’ and for breeding, which in turn contributes to the exploitative international trade in wild animals. They also send the wrong message to children and young people who should be taught that wild animals belong in their natural habitat, not kept in inappropriate enclosures in captivity, for humans to exploit for profit. The council should take these considerations seriously when determining whether this development is appropriate.
For these reasons, I respectfully ask the council to reject this application and prioritise the well-being of animals, the protection of local residents, and the wider public interest.
Yours sincerely,